The Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) stands as a pivotal religious institution in the landscape of Eastern Orthodoxy. Its formation, influenced by centuries of ecclesiastical and geopolitical shifts, marks a significant development in the religious history of Ukraine. The OCU’s journey from its early Christian roots to its current autocephalous status reflects a complex interplay of faith, culture, and politics.
Ancient Beginnings and Evolution
The inception of Christianity in Kyivan Rus’ in 988 under Prince Volodymyr the Great laid the foundation for the Orthodox Christian tradition in the region. This monumental event heralded the establishment of the Metropolitanate of Kyiv, aligning initially with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. Over time, the Metropolitanate became a central figure in the spiritual life of the Eastern Slavs, fostering a unique religious identity.
The subsequent centuries witnessed significant ecclesiastical realignments. A critical moment arrived in 1448 when the Council of Moscow’s Bishops, without Constantinople’s consent, appointed Jonah, Bishop of Riazan, as Metropolitan of Kyiv. This act marked the beginning of the Church of Muscovy’s gradual estrangement from Constantinople’s jurisdiction.
The Union of Brest in 1596 further complicated matters, bifurcating Ukrainian Christianity into Orthodox and Greek Catholics. The annexation of the Metropolitanate of Kyiv by the Moscow Patriarchate in 1686, under dubious circumstances involving simony, signaled a notable shift. The Metropolitanate of Kyiv, in effect, became a diocese of the Moscow Patriarchate, a move later contested for its violation of canonical norms and political overtones.
Efforts to restore the Orthodox Church of Ukraine to the Constantinople fold were evident during the reign of the Ukrainian Hetman Ivan Mazepa. His efforts, aligned with the Eastern Orthodox tradition, were mirrored in the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk (1710), which underscored the Eastern Orthodox faith as Ukraine’s official religion, envisaging direct subordination to the Apostolic Church of Constantinople. However, political upheavals, particularly the Battle of Poltava, impeded these aspirations.
The early 20th century saw renewed efforts for ecclesiastical independence in the wake of the Russian Empire’s dissolution. The Directorate of Ukraine, under Symon Petliura, played a crucial role in advocating for an autocephalous Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The subsequent All-Ukrainian Synod in Kyiv in 1921 declared the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church independent from Moscow. However, Soviet repression in the 1930s led to its dissolution, with its remnants finding refuge in the Ukrainian diaspora.
Revival and Struggle
The late 20th century marked a pivotal era for Ukrainian Orthodoxy. The disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 provided a fertile ground for religious revival. This period saw the resurgence of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC) and the formation of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP). These movements sought to restore a distinct Ukrainian ecclesiastical identity, separate from the Moscow Patriarchate’s influence.
Despite these efforts, the path to a united, independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church was fraught with challenges. The UAOC and UOC-KP, while significant in their roles, faced obstacles in gaining widespread recognition. The persistence of these entities, however, was indicative of a strong desire among many Ukrainian Orthodox Christians for a church that was both autocephalous and reflective of their national identity.
Unification and Autocephaly
The year 2018 witnessed a historic milestone in the journey of Ukrainian Orthodoxy. The Unification Council, convened in Kyiv’s Saint Sophia Cathedral, brought together representatives of the UAOC, UOC-KP, and two bishops from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate). This council led to the formation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), uniting the previously fragmented Orthodox entities in Ukraine.
The Ecumenical Patriarchate’s granting of the Tomos of Autocephaly on 5 January 2019 was a watershed moment. This act not only recognized the OCU’s ecclesiastical independence but also reaffirmed the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s historical role in Ukrainian Orthodoxy. The OCU’s establishment and the subsequent recognition by other autocephalous Orthodox Churches symbolized a significant shift in the Orthodox world, realigning centuries-old ecclesiastical boundaries.
Contemporary Challenges and Future Outlook
The formation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) marked the beginning of a new era in the religious life of Ukraine. However, this historical event did not resolve all ecclesiastical challenges. The OCU continues to face resistance from some quarters, including the Russian Orthodox Church, which vehemently opposed the granting of autocephaly. This opposition is rooted in long-standing religious and geopolitical tensions, highlighting the intricate relationship between church and state in Eastern Orthodoxy.
The OCU’s journey is further complicated by internal dynamics and governance issues. The conflict between Patriarch Filaret and Metropolitan Epiphanius, primarily over governance and jurisdictional matters, underscores the delicate balance needed in maintaining unity within the newly established church. Additionally, the task of integrating numerous parishes and clerical personnel into a cohesive structure poses significant administrative challenges.
Despite these hurdles, the OCU holds a significant position in the Ukrainian religious landscape. Its existence is a testament to the enduring quest for religious autonomy and national identity among Ukrainian Orthodox Christians. As the OCU navigates these challenges, its future trajectory will significantly impact not only Ukrainian Orthodoxy but also the broader Eastern Orthodox communion.
The Orthodox Church of Ukraine stands as a beacon of religious independence and national identity in the complex tapestry of Eastern Orthodoxy. Its historical journey—from the Christianization of Kyivan Rus’ to the recent granting of autocephaly—reflects the enduring spirit of a people seeking spiritual autonomy. While challenges remain, the OCU’s evolution continues to shape the religious and cultural identity of Ukraine.
References
- Florovsky, G. (1963). “Eastern Orthodoxy.” Harvard University Press.
- Hrynshchyshyn, H. (2008). “Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church: History and Faith.” Rodopi.
- Kisha, D. (2015). “Religion and Nationalism in Ukraine.” Cambridge University Press.
- Louth, A. (2007). “Eastern Christianity.” Cambridge University Press.
- “Metropolitan Epifaniy’s report at the Hierarchal Assembly on December 15, 2020.” Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Accessed January 9, 2024).
- “OCU Claims to be Recognized by Alexandrian Church.” Religious Information Service of Ukraine (Accessed January 9, 2024).
- Plokhy, S. (2017). “The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine.” Basic Books.
- “Recognition of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine by the Church of Greece.” Orthodoxie (Accessed January 9, 2024).
- Ryerson, J. (2011). “The Orthodox Church in Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century.” Oxford University Press.
- Skira, J. (2019). “The Orthodox Church of Ukraine: Autocephaly and Beyond.” Routledge.
- Solovei, D. (2012). “The Struggle for the Kyivan Patriarchate: History and Contemporary Significance.” LIT Verlag.
- “U.S. Congratulates Ukraine’s Metropolitan Epifaniy on Election as Head of Local Orthodox Church.” UNIAN (Accessed January 9, 2024).
- Ware, K. (1993). “The Orthodox Church.” Penguin Books.